Physics professor Steven E. Jones of BYU in Provo, Utah, has developed a new theory about the terrorist attack in New York City on September 11th, 2001. He believes planes alone did not bring down the buildings. Both towers collapsed in place after the attacks, and later that day, #7 World Trade Center, which was never hit by a plane, fell in less than seven seconds.
Professor Jones has written an academic hypothesis that powerful explosives may have been pre-positioned in the buildings. He says that #7 World Trade Center, damaged and ablaze from nearby debris, did not topple over as would be expected from the second law of thermodynamics. It came straight down, such as in a pre-planned demolition. The professor says that models conducted in tests since 9/11 have not been able to duplicate what happened to the buildings in New York. His is not a proven theory, but a hypothesis, that he believes warrants a new independent investigation.




Save This Page



Mad Scientist at BYU!
It is a shame that a professor at Brigham Young University, A school owned by my church, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints would stoop to conspiracy theories instead of hard science. Steven E. Jones a nuclear physics professor has theor…
Trackback by Oblogatory Anecdotes — November 13, 2005 @ 1:18 am
Brunch: 11/13/2005
Try one of these specials with your brunch:
Sigmund, Carl and Alfred look at the City Alight Of Light
Outside the Beltway looks at trouble in France
Blogs for Bush looks at the truth about White Phosphorous
Confederate Yankee has more on White P…
Trackback by basil's blog — November 13, 2005 @ 10:14 am
Oblogatory Anecdotes: its a SHAME that people dont open their minds, and accept as sheeple conspiracy theories spreaded by governments: wmd in iraq, saddam involved with 9/11, and so on, there are millions there, and they REALLY benefit from that stuff, its not just selling dvds.. tho the majority of the 911 movement spreads them for free.
Where are your arguments to counter the Jones’ paper?
Religious people should fight this situation… www.mujca.com : serious people there.
Comment by Ministry of Truth — November 17, 2005 @ 8:17 pm
Here is the truth about 9/11 to counter Jones’ argument:
“At 8:46 on the morning of September 11, 2001, the United States became a nation transformed. More than 2,600 people died at the World Trade Center; 125 died at the Pentagon; 256 died on the four planes. The death toll surpassed that at Pearl Harbor in December 1941.
“This immeasurable pain was inflicted by 19 young Arabs acting at the behest of Islamist extremists headquartered in distant Afghanistan. Some had been in the United States for more than a year, mixing with the rest of the population. Though four had training as pilots, most were not well-educated. Most spoke English poorly, some hardly at all. In groups of four or five, carrying with them only small knives, box cutters, and cans of Mace or pepper spray, they had hijacked the four planes and turned them into deadly guided missiles.”
From “The 9/11 Commission Report”, page 2.
Comment by Kerfuffles — November 18, 2005 @ 7:41 am
Hello KErfuffles. Only 2 things.
1) At least 7 hijackers are alive, HERE
2) The 911 commission report doesnt even mention WTC7. Why? Given that we are speaking about Jones’claimings, we should speak about them..
Comment by Ministry of Truth — November 18, 2005 @ 8:45 am
Ministry of Truth? - You will have to come up with better sources than undocumented, out-of-the-mainstream web logs, the thoroughly discredited BBC, and the thoroughly wacky IndyMedia Looneytune Network, if you expect to influence anyone with a mind.
Comment by Kerfuffles — November 18, 2005 @ 10:24 am
Kerfuffles: as u want, if u dont like sources like BBC, I’ll try with some other ones.
Starting from these link u will find ABC, the indipendent, The Telegraph, Guardian, LA times..
http://100777.com/node/237
http://www.911dossier.co.uk/pen03.html
Let me suggest u even to read this article:
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110007559
Take care, heavy conspirators there, on conspiracy papers.
What about the Jersey widow conspiracy nuts? and what about Rodriguez? Inform yourself, and remember that I’m still waiting for your answer about WTC7.
Comment by Ministry of Truth — November 18, 2005 @ 4:38 pm
As u want, there is no problem, If u dont like BBC there are many, here a re the links..
http://100777.com/node/237
http://www.911dossier.co.uk/pen03.html
U will find ABC, The Indipendent, Guardian, CBS..
Are they ok?
Anyway, I still wait for an answer about WTC7, your answers didnt reply to nothing, in fact Prof.Jones said that the planes were a diversive tactic..
Comment by Ministry of Truth — November 18, 2005 @ 5:14 pm
Sorry for the double post, I didnt think it was moderated, I just thought my first comment didnt work.
Comment by Ministry of Truth — November 19, 2005 @ 2:12 am