<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Georgetown U Ignorami</title>
	<link>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2006/01/25/georgetown-u-ignorami/</link>
	<description>Tintinnabulating Out Kerfuffles With Nattering Palaver Since 2002 AD</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Kerfuffles</title>
		<link>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2006/01/25/georgetown-u-ignorami/#comment-1375</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:04:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2006/01/25/georgetown-u-ignorami/#comment-1375</guid>
					<description>This quotation &quot;THOSE WHO WOULD SACRIFICE LIBERTY FOR SECURITY, DESERVE NEITHER&quot; is being misrepresented as words of Benjamin Franklin. The quotation is not from him, as far as I can find. It is in fact, a &quot;protest banner&quot; for Progressives, Liberals &amp;amp; Democrats. That is fine for them to have a mantra, but it is not fine for them to claim it as a quote from Ben Franklin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This quotation &#8220;THOSE WHO WOULD SACRIFICE LIBERTY FOR SECURITY, DESERVE NEITHER&#8221; is being misrepresented as words of Benjamin Franklin. The quotation is not from him, as far as I can find. It is in fact, a &#8220;protest banner&#8221; for Progressives, Liberals &amp; Democrats. That is fine for them to have a mantra, but it is not fine for them to claim it as a quote from Ben Franklin.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Virgil Byron</title>
		<link>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2006/01/25/georgetown-u-ignorami/#comment-1374</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:20:02 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2006/01/25/georgetown-u-ignorami/#comment-1374</guid>
					<description>The meaning of the quote isn't changed at all.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The meaning of the quote isn&#8217;t changed at all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kerfuffles</title>
		<link>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2006/01/25/georgetown-u-ignorami/#comment-336</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2006/01/25/georgetown-u-ignorami/#comment-336</guid>
					<description>The dictionary definition of &lt;i&gt;&quot;paraphrase&quot;&lt;/i&gt; is: a restatement of a text, passage, or work giving the meaning in another form. The placard set off the phrase with quotation marks, which is only necessary when the phrase is &lt;i&gt;&quot;quoted&quot;&lt;/i&gt;, not paraphrased.  The changing and dropping of words from the original quotation of Ben Franklin, does seem to change the meaning, so it probably does not qualify as a &lt;i&gt;&quot;paraphrase&quot;&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The dictionary definition of <i>&#8220;paraphrase&#8221;</i> is: a restatement of a text, passage, or work giving the meaning in another form. The placard set off the phrase with quotation marks, which is only necessary when the phrase is <i>&#8220;quoted&#8221;</i>, not paraphrased.  The changing and dropping of words from the original quotation of Ben Franklin, does seem to change the meaning, so it probably does not qualify as a <i>&#8220;paraphrase&#8221;</i>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brian Simmonds</title>
		<link>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2006/01/25/georgetown-u-ignorami/#comment-334</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2006/01/25/georgetown-u-ignorami/#comment-334</guid>
					<description>It's not a misquote -- it's a paraphrase.  There are space limitations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s not a misquote &#8212; it&#8217;s a paraphrase.  There are space limitations.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2006/01/25/georgetown-u-ignorami/#comment-333</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2006/01/25/georgetown-u-ignorami/#comment-333</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Turning their backs on the truth&lt;/strong&gt;

	Attorney General Alberto Gonzales gave a speech yesterday at Georgetown University law school in defense of domestic warrantless wiretaps.    The Washington Post&amp;#8217;s write up on the speech of course included quotes from only those who disagreed wi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>Turning their backs on the truth</strong></p>
	<p>	Attorney General Alberto Gonzales gave a speech yesterday at Georgetown University law school in defense of domestic warrantless wiretaps.    The Washington Post&#8217;s write up on the speech of course included quotes from only those who disagreed wi&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
