Kerfuffles

Hang ‘em HIGH, Hang ‘em LOW, Just as long as you HANG ‘em all, each and every one of those uppity white women! – Obamaniacs in Hollywood.

More Obama Supporters Display Hatred for Women. Chad Michael Morrisette and his leering sidekick are the faces of vulgar, despicable women-haters.

His name is Chad Michael Morrisette and he thinks any woman who is so “uppity” that she would run for the Vice Presidency of the United States, deserves to be hanged. He explains that there is NO worry that anyone would DARE “hang” his man, Barack Obama, as “hanging” a black man in today’s America would be an unacceptable act of RACISM, besides being a hate crime. In contrast, sexism, misogyny and violence against white women are acceptable. Besides, stringing up and hanging a white woman in America is just plain fun. Busloads of Californians and Canadian tourists are driving by to get their laughs for the day.

“The image of a hanged black man is a lot more intense than the image of a hanged white woman — for our country — in the history of our country.” –Chad Michael Morrisette speaking of his “art work.”

If you cannot make it out to California for your Hollywood laugh, you can watch the video and Laugh At A Woman Being Hanged. Welcome to Obama’s Changed America! And no, you cannot wonder to yourself about what kind of vile women birthed and raised these sub-human specimens of disgust. That would probably be labeled as “RACIST” hate thoughts, don’t you know, in this era of Obamania morals.

IF You Hate UPPITY Women, Vote OBAMA!

The supporters of Barack Obama find shades of racism in almost every utterance of those who have chosen not to vote for “The One.” Apparently racism is the great sin; misogyny and sexism are NOT sins. In fact, misogyny and sexism are the stock in trade of the Obama campaign and American misogyny and sexism are the main reason that Obama is ahead in the polls. The Americans who respond to polls, both men and women, hate women such as American-made Sarah Palin who is running with John McCain.

As we have seen since the Democrat primary, and the Obama Campaign’s treatment of Hillary Clinton, Obama supporters despise women. In mid October, in Manhattan, a rare group of McCain supporters held placards on a street corner. An Obama supporter was offended at this sighting of “free speech” and “free assembly” in liberal New York City and decided to physically attack them. Which McCain supporter did “the Obama man” choose to assault? The one and only WOMAN in the group! That is typical of the Obama Campaign’s disrespect for WOMEN!

The Philadelphia Inquirer says that Women ARE the Losers in this Campaign. At numerous Obama rallies, male supporters can be observed wearing tee shirts describing Sarah Palin with the most vile and obscene word that can be used for a woman in the English language. At the mere mention of the name of the Governor of Alaska and former mayor of an Alaskan town by Barack Obama, shouts of “stone her” are often heard from his supporters. Instead of criticizing her stance on issues and beliefs, Obama’s supporters have viciously attacked and belittled Sarah Palin for her womanhood alone.

“The Allure of a Demagogue”

Al Obama’s Race Card to the White House

Three years ago I wrote “Canada’s Remembrance Day 2005” in which I mentioned Canadian military forces serving in Vietnam during the era of America’s Vietnam War and the Nobel Peace Prize they were awarded for their service. I never realized the rancor that revelation would come to garner. It began when I was called a LIAR by a Canadian commenter to my own blog:

“The Canadian Armed Forces won a Nobel Peace Prize for their efforts in Vietnam.” What year was that? I used Google to save myself from Liberal bias, and discovered that this was a total blatant lie. (October 12, 2006)

To this day I am still being called a “LIAR” for writing facts that I found from my own research.

Political Forum Commenter: (The Page Has Been Removed by August 2008) “but here is a link to the list of nobel peace prize winners. So far I do not see the Canadians on the list which leads me to believe that this blogger is a liar. They could have only made that up so if they made that up God knows what else. Winners of the Nobel Peace Prize“

Apparently, for Canadians, the truth hurts. For Canada’s military to be awarded a Nobel Peace Prize for its war efforts is so discomforting to many Canadians that they refuse to believe the facts, and instead, label innocent researchers, such as myself, as LIARS! In 2005, Kerfuffles wrote in “Canada’s Remembrance Day 2005:”

In 1973, the International Commission of Control and Supervision Vietnam (ICCS) was responsible for securing the armistice that lasted two years from 1973 to 1975, known as Operation Gallant. Canada, a member of the commission, contributed Canadian Forces whose role was to monitor the cease-fire in South Vietnam, according to the Paris Peace Conference, and to arrange the release and exchange of more than 32,000 prisoners of war. **The Canadian Armed Forces won a Nobel Peace Prize for their efforts in Vietnam.

**The Nobel Peace Prize referenced was awarded in 1988, when United Nations Peace-Keeping Forces were awarded THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE for all peace-keeping duties up to December 1988.

On October 26, 2006 Kerfuffles wrote:

“In 1988, Canada and our peace-keeping forces shared in winning the Nobel Peace Prize. (Proceedings of the Subcommittee on Veterans Affairs, OTTAWA, Tuesday, February 3, 1998.” (See Canadian Peacekeepers and THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE 1988.)

In 1988, the Nobel Committee recognized the good work that UN Peacekeepers had accomplished by awarding them the Nobel Peace Prize. The prize was awarded for United Nations-service/Korea service up until 10 December 1988, when the Nobel Peace Prize Award was granted.

Therefore, these UN Peacekeepers included the Canadian peacekeeping troops of Operation Gallant, 1973, the military operation associated with the International Commission of Control and Supervision(ICCS) Vietnam whose role it was to monitor the cease-fire in South Vietnam as per the Paris Peace Accords.
Even though it offends the “peace-loving” sensitivities of many Canadians, I stand by my statement: “The Canadian Armed Forces won a Nobel Peace Prize for their efforts in Vietnam.” My information came from Canada’s own Canadian Veterans Affairs and Canada’s own Canadian Parliament.

Canadian Parliament, 12 March 1997
Mr. Jack Frazer: I think you will all have received a letter from the Canadian Peacekeeping Veterans Association. In it, in the fourth paragraph, they point out that Secretary-General Javier Perez de Cuellar said in 1988, when announcing the award:

This Nobel Peace Prize is to be shared by every member of the UN Peacekeeping Force since its inception. That meant that Nobel Peace Prize was shared equally amongst the people who qualified for it at that time.

The Government of Canada has built a peacekeeping monument here in Ottawa, but there is no way for any individual, regardless of what medals he is wearing, to indicate he or she was a valid recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize when it was given to the then peacekeepers. That is what the people in the Peacekeeping Veterans Association are keen to have: recognition that they were part of the peacekeepers who won that recognition for Canada. It could be said that others since that time have done basically the same thing, but the truth is, of course, that the Nobel Peace Prize has not been awarded since 1988, so the people before that time do qualify, the ones post that time do not qualify.

My question for Canadians is why do you diminish the sacrifice and service of your own country’s military forces just because they happened to do their peacekeeping service in Vietnam?

A Canada that no longer welcomes military deserters from the United States? What’s Up?

At the start of the Iraq War Canada was welcoming with open arms deserters from the United States military forces. “Message from Canada: War Resisters Welcome Here!” Because Canada euphemistically labeled them as “War Resisters” a number of misguided American soldiers took the bait. One of those DESERTERS turned “War Resister” was National Guard Sergeant Corey Glass.

So how fares War Resister Sergeant Glass in his newly adopted homeland? Well … Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Board has just denied Glass’s application for refugee status and the Canadian Border Services Agency has issued him a June 12 deportation order to a country, the U.S. of A., where he is considered, not a “war resister,” but a wartime deserter.

Canada to Deport U.S. Deserter
Sergeant Glass, of Fairmont, Indiana, says he attempted to walk away from the U.S. Army but was told that would be desertion, which was punishable by death. Therefore, he welcomed Canada’s most gracious invitation, as anyplace would be better than facing a firing squad. But now the Sergeant DESERTER is on his way back to the land, people and messmates that he deserted a few short years ago.

Now how fair is that Canada?
To create a national folk hero out of an invited refugee because he spit in the eye of the United States military, and then to turn around and send that “invited refugee hero” back to his native land to face those same military mad dogs and wild wolves seems a bit inhumane, don’t you think, Canada? Sergeant Glass should take his case to the United Nations, as this is surely an international violation of human rights by Canada. If you are an American deserter or “war resister” BEWARE of Canada’s Open Arms. You cannot be guaranteed that you will receive that glorious welcome that awaited the Vietnam War deserters and draft dodgers of another era.

“I don’t think it is fair that I should be returned to the United States to face unjust punishment for doing what I felt morally obligated to do. I appeal to the Canadian people and the Canadian government to honor their tradition of respect for human rights and support my decision not to participate in this unjust war.” (Corey Glass Begs Canada to Rescind Deportation Order)

YouTube Clip - Canada Has Failed Corey Glass

Canada’s Good $en$e - During the Vietnam Era

In March of 2007, there was a comment entered at my blog “Kerfuffles & Flourishes” about our peaceable northern neighbor: “Canada had the good sense to stay out of the Vietnam war.” I thought to myself, “God bless Canuckistan and please, God, save the world from any more of her peacekeeping efforts!”

Oh Yes - that is what Canadians believe, that they had the “good $en$e” to stay out of the Vietnam War. However, … history tells the story differently. Although Canada didn’t send a fighting force - Canada sent a lot of other things - like war materiel that didn’t go directly to Vietnam, lest Canada’s ruse be discovered. In fact, Canada was so busy manufacturing war materiel for the American forces in Vietnam that the entire country was booming like a well-oiled machine. And the Canadian government had the “good $en$e” to not tell its citizens just why the country was basking in economic good fortune, with unemployment below 4%, instead letting them believe that the manna falling from the heavens was their reward for being good little peacekeepers.

Canada’s “good $en$e” to stay out of the Vietnam War brought them record sales of iron ore, lead, zinc, copper, nickel, asbestos, and oil to the United States, not to mention the warplane components and arms sales. Although fighting the scourge of communism in Vietnam was offensive to Canadian sensibilities, American “blood money” was not. In June 1968, the new Canadian prime minister, Pierre Trudeau, officially declared that there was absolutely no immorality involved in selling arms to the United States during the war in Vietnam, any more than it was “to sell them nickel and asbestos and airplane components.”

During the Vietnam era, Canadians were too busy protesting the US involvement in Vietnam to make any efforts to discover their own country’s super secret role in the production of Agent Orange, a weapon that would harm thousands of innocents. The government and manufacturers were claiming that they were shipping an everyday common herbicide that Canadians used to kill weeds in home gardens, under power lines and along railroad tracks. Even though it would wipe out entire jungles in Vietnam, Canadians were told that it was perfectly safe for people, and never, ever did the name of the herbicide, “Agent Orange” pass from their lips.

Oh yeah - Canadians had the “good $en$e to stay out of Vietnam” by selling the Agent Orange to the US army, which at the time was involved in Vietnam. Since it was American planes that sprayed the Agent Orange, wiping out thousands upon thousands of acres of trees and crops in Vietnam, Canadians could continue to live free and guiltless. The fact that Agent Orange was more than a harmless herbicide, that it contained poisonous dioxins, was an American failing, and no fault nor moral problem for Canadian manufacturers, … whose government leaders had had the “good $en$e” to financially profit from the Vietnam War, instead of fighting in it.

And if you don’t believe Kerfuffles, listen to voices from history describing “Canada’s War Profiteering” at Canada’s own CBC (The CBC Digital Archives Website): Supplying the War Machine: “The Uniroyal plant in Elmira, Ont., was one of seven suppliers producing Agent Orange for the U.S. military.” Or you can continue to believe the statement of the Canadian government’s report to parliament in 1970: “no research carried out by the Department of National Defence has affected the use of chemicals in Vietnam.”

When I mentioned at another blog, “Kerfuffles & Flourishes,” that I was planning to write about Canada’s role with Agent Orange and explain why all those Vietnam refugees taken in by Canada, were forced to leave their native land, one Canadian commenter replied: “Yeah we know: guns don’t kill people, people kill people, but all those Vietnamese who had Agent Orange dropped on them by the Americans were killed by Canada! Hilarious!” (The Comment)

No Stoning, Canada Migrants Warned

“We wish to inform these new arrivals that the way of life which they abandoned when they left their countries of origin cannot be recreated here,” … We consider it completely outside norms to… kill women by stoning them in public, burning them alive, burning them with acid, circumcising them etc.”

Because of recent culture clashes, a small town in Quebec, Herouxville (population 1300), has made a public declaration stating their community norms and that declaration has been branded as “racist” by their fellow countrymen. A community leader, Councillor Andre Drouin, replied that the rules were not racist, but were reminding newcomers that in his town women are allowed to drive, vote, dance and own their own homes and that Sikh children may not carry ceremonial daggers to school, even though the Supreme Court has ruled they can. “We invite people from all nationalities, all languages, all sexual orientations, whatever, to come live with us, but we want them to know ahead of time how we live,” he said.

Among those declaring the Québecois as “racist” was Salam Elmenyawi of the Muslim Council of Montreal: “I was shocked and insulted to see these kinds of false stereotypes and ignorance about Islam and our religion.”

This warning came soon after a Toronto judge ordered a Christmas tree removed from a court so as not to offend non-Christians and a Montreal gym was required to install frosted glass after a Hasidic synagogue complained that seeing people exercising was offensive to them. To top it off, a Montreal police officer who wrote a song called “That’s Enough Already” is being investigated for urging immigrants in Quebec to assimilate. The lyrics of his song include the lines: “We want to accept ethnics, but not at any price… if you’re not happy with your fate, there’s a place called the airport.”

Is the new Canadian norm now “down with Christianity and free speech, as it may ‘OFFEND’ someone, somewhere, and up with ‘TOLERANCE’ of any religion or creed that is not Christian-based”?

Tucker Carlson Explains Canada:

Tucker Carlson Explains Canada
(VIDEO of Tucker Carlson and Ann Coulter on Canada)

Dumped, Dropped, Canned

With her book at #2 on Amazon, it probably does not much matter to Ann Coulter that she is now being fired by national publications for her latest screeds. Harridan to Liberals, heroine to Right-wingers, she is not Kerfuffles’ choice for a representative of Conservatism, although conservative she is indeed. Like her or love her, she is entertaining when she displays the distinctive public persona she has so meticulously crafted. Whisking away her long blond hair from her always sleeveless shoulders, she drives Liberals wild, especially those of the female variety. Since the publication of her latest screed, “Godless”, she has taken to wearing a Christian cross to appropriately accentuate her plunging neckline, or is it vice-versa?

However, even Kerfuffles has defended Ann Coulter when she was correct, as in this case of Liberal revisionist history about which Kerfuffles blogged last year: “Ann Coulter Was Right!.”

As Canada prepares to honor her veterans during Veterans’ Week 2005, the following was posted at their Department of Defence Web site:

“During Veterans’ Week November 5-11, Canadians will pay tribute to those who fought in the two World Wars and the Korean Conflict. Their thoughts will also extend to CF members who died while serving Canada in peacekeeping and peace support operations during the past 50 years.”

Notice anyone missing amongst the veteran honorees? EARL McRAE of “The Ottawa Sun” explains as he reminds us of how Canada is treating her prodigal veterans on this Remembrance Day 2005: “Soldier won’t be attending today’s war memorial. Why? He fought in Vietnam.”

“I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, Whom shall I send, and who will go for us? Then said I, Here am I; send me.” –Isaiah 6:8

In 1973, the International Commission of Control and Supervision Vietnam (ICCS) was responsible for securing the armistice that lasted two years from 1973 to 1975, known as Operation Gallant. Canada, a member of the commission, contributed Canadian Forces whose role was to monitor the cease-fire in South Vietnam, according to the Paris Peace Conference, and to arrange the release and exchange of more than 32,000 prisoners of war. **The Canadian Armed Forces won a Nobel Peace Prize for their efforts in Vietnam. The image here is of the Service Vietnam medal issued by the government of Canada to 253 members of the Canadian Armed Forces who served in Vietnam. This number does not include the thousands of Canadians who served in Vietnam or during the Vietnam era, nor does this figure include the 104 Canadians killed in that war, nor the seven missing in action; not to mention a winner of the Medal of Honor.

The Canadian government believed that because of its membership in ICCS, that Canada had to remain impartial during the Vietnam Conflict. While Canada as a nation was not involved in the fighting, Canadians themselves formed the largest foreign contingent in the U.S. military during the Vietnam era. Although exact numbers are not obtainable, some estimate that between 30,000 and 40,000 served and that 12,000 Canadians actually were in American uniforms in the war zone.

When the Canadian Vietnam veterans returned to their homeland, they were even more unwelcome than here in the United States, where at least returning veterans had access to government resources. Today’s Canadians have been “re-educated” to believe the fictional propaganda that Canada “took a pass on Vietnam”, as was told to them recently by Bob McKeown, a journalist of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. For Canadians to continue to see themselves as the world’s respected nation of “peacekeepers”, they cannot ever acknowledge the sacrifices of their fellow countrymen who fought on the battlefield against the scourge of Communism during the Cold War.

Canada did not “TAKE A PASS ON VIETNAM”! Canada was allied alongside the United States. With the advent of the Internet and Google, Canadians and Hate America Liberals can no longer get away with rewriting Canadian history.

Near the U.S. border there is one memorial, “The North Wall”, at Assumption Park, Windsor, Ontario, overlooking the Detroit River. It honors the 103 Canadians who lost their lives in Vietnam and the seven who went missing in action. It is a fine tribute to those Canadians who served and sacrificed all for their belief in freedom.

The North Wall

Canadian Vets

Canada’s Forgotten Veterans

The Road to Hell - Canadian Forces in Vietnam 1954-1973 (pdf)

Oh Canada, We Stood On Guard for Thee

Canada Took a Pass on Vietnam?

**The Nobel Peace Prize referenced was awarded in 1988, when United Nations Peace-Keeping Forces were awarded THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE for all peace-keeping duties up to December 1988.

Our northern friends and neighbors, the Canadians, are not quite as liberal minded and inclusive as they portray themselves to be. They have a very large population of Muslim citizens, yet the government in one province has squelched a new law that would have allowed them to be governed by their own Sharia law in family disputes, such as divorces and child custodies.

If it had not been for the Canadian women’s movement, the Muslim clerics would have likely succeeded in getting the legislation accepted. Now they know who to blame for the blatant religious discrimination against them. Passage of the new legislation would have been one more “first” feather in the cap of the all inclusive and morally superior Canadians. If the legislature had accepted the recommendation, the province of Ontario would have once again led the way to the brave new world, becoming the first Western country to allow citizens to be governed by Sharia law.

However, Ontario’s rejection will be seen for what it is by Islam’s faithful; outright religious intolerance, as the province already allows Catholics and Jews to have faith-based arbitrations in their disputes.

BBC News