terrorism, national security, United States, immigrationNovember 16, 2007 8:08 am

If Americans were really serious about reforming immigration they would stop blaming the illegal immigrants and put the onus where it belongs – on WASHINGTON.

If Americans were truly serious, they would elect a 100% brand new United States Congress and a new President who would drive a bulldozer through both the Immigration and Naturalization Service (I.N.S.) and the Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.). While our soldiers are bleeding and dying in foreign lands to protect the homeland against terrorists who want nothing more than to enter the United States and do their dastardly deeds, high level administrators of those two aforementioned agencies have been accepting bribes to allow any illegal with $50,000 to become embedded in American society and obtain legal status and citizenship.

Take the case of just one high level government employee, Robert T. Schofield, 57, who recently pled guilty in a Virginia court to taking more than $600,000 in bribes, yet was originally charged with accepting more than $8.1 million in return for fraudulent green cards. Of the more than 200 illegal immigrants who received U.S. citizenship from Schofield, fewer than a dozen have been located. What are all the others up to at this very moment in time?

When we get smart enough to replace of 100% of the United States Congress, let’s consider keeping Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) who in July 2006, sent a letter to the Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) of D.H.S. regarding the arrest of Mr. Schofield, demanding to know how “a man with this history was in a supervisory position in [USCIS], where he could exploit his position of trust to sell U.S. citizenship to the highest bidder?” (CitizensForEthics.org)

Those who want to claim that Robert T. Schofield was just ONE bad apple in the INS-DHS barrel of apples, are themselves sandy-headed ostriches. Mr. Schofield flaunted much of his chicanery in the open. In fact, it was his outrageous brazenness, not his criminality, that finally forced law enforcement to take action. Schofield had supervisors who could not have been ignorant of his modus operandi. American taxpayers need to ask themselves why. Why did those charged with overseeing the activities of Mr. Schofield’s supervisors look the other way and why was he promoted and further rewarded by his superiors, even after his criminalities and indiscretions were found out?

Common sense tells one that Robert T. Schofield is but the tip of the iceberg. It is an understatement to declare that “it’s nothing new.” The New York Times wrote about the corruption rife at I.N.S. in 1994: In Immigration Labyrinth, Corruption Comes Easily by STEPHEN ENGELBERG.

Up and down the East Coast, the word quickly spread through immigrant communities. Come to the Northern Virginia offices of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Bring cash. Buy the right to live or work in the United States.

Smooth-talking middlemen took care of the details, bribing immigration service employees with gold jewelry, free vacations and cash-filled envelopes passed hand to hand in the aisles of a nearby department store. Ghanaians, Lebanese and Salvadorans, among others, flocked to what quickly became a multicultural bazaar. Most came from the Washington area, but others drove hundreds of miles and scribbled phony local addresses.

… “We let it happen,” one employee involved in the case said in a recent interview. “There was no supervision to tighten down on us, and we let it go real wild.”

Altogether, the I.N.S. said, they had fraudulently given more than 4,000 people permission to work and sold legal residency to 1,000 more immigrants who did not qualify.

In the cases of abuse described in 1994, the senior managers of I.N.S. claimed to be largely unaware of any abuse, insisting that only a small minority of the agency’s employees succumb to temptation, and that those who did take bribes were “entry-level employees — some earning barely more than the minimum wage.” That is not what Mr. Schofield was, nor his superiors who were complicit in his treachery.

For ten years the government had investigated numerous allegations that Schofield was on the take. In 1991, Schofield, as an I.N.S. special agent, botched investigation of an Asian brothel in Washington by engaging in an ‘inappropriate relationship’ with an informant. When he was demoted for ‘conduct unbecoming a government employee,’ he absconded to the Far East where he used his two government issued credit cards to support himself. How Schofield managed to legally return to Washington and whether he repaid American taxpayers for the $36,000 credit card fraud is clouded by bureaucratic murkiness, but return he did. He rose in the ranks, and when the new Department of Homeland Security took over I.N.S. functions in 2003, Robert T. Schofield surfaced as a supervisor tasked by higher ups with protecting the Homeland.

So let’s hear no more of elaborate regulatory schemes to be administered by these same congressmen, senators, presidential candidates and Robert T. Schofields. Schofield miscreants continue their betrayals in these government agencies; “civil servants” who are more interested in lining their pockets than in protecting their own homeland. It is shameful to say the least, when other, better Americans are putting their lives on the line to protect us from the evildoers.

“Immigration Official Pleads Guilty” - WaPo December 2006

liberals, America, immigrationJuly 16, 2007 6:59 pm

This is another of those e-mails that travel about the Internet. This one claims to be from the “Letters to the Editor” in a newspaper somewhere.

Recently large demonstrations have taken place across the country protesting the fact that Congress is finally addressing the issue of illegal immigration. Certain people are angry that the US might protect its own borders, might make it harder to sneak into this country and, once here, to stay indefinitely. Let me see if I correctly understand the thinking behind these protests.

Let’s say I break into your house. Let’s say that when you discover me in your house, you insist that I leave. But I say, “I’ve made all the beds and washed the dishes and did the laundry and swept the floors. I’ve done all the things you don’t like to do. I’m hard-working and honest (except for when I broke into your house).

According to the protesters:

  • You are Required to let me stay in your house.
  • You are Required to add me to your family’s insurance plan.
  • You are Required to Educate my kids.
  • You are Required to Provide other benefits to me & to my family (my husband will do all of your yard work because he is also hard-working and honest, except for that breaking in part).

If you try to call the police or force me out, I will call my friends who will picket your house carrying signs that proclaim my RIGHT to be there.

It’s only fair, after all, because you have a nicer house than I do, and I’m just trying to better myself. I’m a hard-working and honest, person, except for well, you know. I did break into your house and what a deal it is for me! I live in your house, contributing only a fraction of the cost of my keep, and there is nothing you can do about it without being accused of cold, uncaring, selfish, prejudiced, and bigoted behavior.

Oh yeah, I DEMAND that you learn MY LANGUAGE so you can communicate with me.

Why can’t people see how ridiculous this is? If you agree, pass it on (in English). Share it if you see the value of it. If not, blow it off … along with your future Social Security funds, and a lot of other things.

The problem with this supposedly logical explanation, is that it assumes that “your house” is really “your house.” Liberals do not consider that “your house” is yours. They consider that the place where you live is community property to be used for the benefit for the entire world community.

United States, immigrationJune 5, 2007 10:08 am

Separating “Z” Facts from “Z” Fiction According to “Z” White House
Kerfuffles received the following memo from the Office of the Press Secretary of the THE WHITE HOUSE, Prague, Czech Republic:

June 5, 2007

Immigration Fact Check: Responding To Key Myths

1. MYTH: Once an individual is granted a Z visa, his or her family outside the country will be eligible for Z visas including his or her spouse, children, spouse’s children, parents and spouse’s parents.

FACT: Z visa eligibility is limited to the finite population of current aliens who were already in the United States illegally as of January 1, 2007. No one outside the U.S. can petition for a Z visa – including family members of Z visa workers.

FACT: Only green card holders and U.S. citizens may petition to bring family members to the U.S. It will take at least 8 years for the first Z visa recipient to receive a green card, and it will take at least 13 years for the first Z visa recipient to become a citizen.

FACT: Z visa holders who eventually receive green cards and become citizens will be subject to the tighter limits on family immigration that the bill imposes. The bill limits future family-based visas to the spouses and minor children of U.S citizens and green card holders, plus a smaller number of parents of U.S. citizens. It eliminates set-asides for siblings and adult children of U.S. citizens.

2. MYTH: Illegal immigrants may stay in probationary status for years without having to apply or meet requirements for a Z visa.

FACT: Illegal immigrants may not obtain probationary status without applying for the Z visa, which requires coming out of the shadows and passing a background check.

FACT: Probationary status is valid only while a Z visa application is pending – it may be revoked at any time if the applicant is found ineligible for the Z visa, fails to maintain a clean record, or fails the background check required for obtaining a Z visa.

FACT: If a worker is deemed eligible for a Z visa, probationary status terminates, and the worker must transition to a Z visa or leave the country. Transitioning to Z status will require the worker to pay a $1,000 fine for head of household and $500 per dependent; up to $1,500 in processing fees per applicant, including heads of household and dependents; and a $500 state impact assistance fee.

FACT: To remain in the United States, the worker is subject to updated background checks on criminal and security history and must stay employed, maintain a clean record, and meet accelerated English and civics requirements by set deadlines. In addition, Z visa holders must pay processing fees of up to $1,500 every four years in order to renew the visa. Z visa holders are not entitled to welfare, Food Stamps, SSI, or non-emergency Medicaid.

3. MYTH: Immigration and Customs Enforcement has scaled back penalties and arrests in worksite enforcement cases.

FACT: In a much more aggressive approach to cracking down on employers who hire illegal aliens, ICE has replaced the old system of administrative hearings and fines with a much tougher combination of criminal prosecutions and asset forfeitures.

FACT: Arrests for criminal violations brought in worksite enforcement actions – the most effective means of enforcement and best measure of ICE’s new approach – have increased significantly from 24 in FY 1999 to a record 716 in FY 2006. There have been 588 criminal arrests since the beginning of FY 2007.

FACT: During the first half of FY 2007, ICE obtained criminal fines, restitutions, and civil judgments in worksite enforcement investigations against egregious violators in excess of $29 million.

FACT: A 2005 program called “Operation Rollback” assessed $15,000,000 in civil fines, an amount greater than the sum of administrative fines collected in the previous eight years combined and the largest worksite enforcement penalty in US history.

FACT: ICE’s interior enforcement strategy targets not only employers of illegal aliens and immigration violators inside this country but also the many criminal networks that support these activities, including human smuggling and trafficking organizations and document or benefit fraud organizations.

4. MYTH: The bill would permit illegal immigrants who have committed violent crimes to remain in the country.

FACT: Applicants convicted of any of a wide range of crimes will not be permitted in the Z visa program. The list of crimes that disqualify applicants extends into the thousands and includes:
o Any felony

o Any three misdemeanors

o Any serious criminal offense

o Violations of any law relating to a controlled substance

· FACT: If a Z visa applicant is rejected because of criminal conduct, the government can immediately place the alien in removal proceedings.

· FACT: Any Z visa application that is rejected because of criminal conduct is no longer subject to confidentiality restrictions. DHS has authority to share the information with law enforcement officials, making it easier to identify and deport criminal aliens.

5. MYTH: The bill ignores the importance of assimilation.

· FACT: An entire subtitle is dedicated to assimilation and outlines several new and expanded assimilation programs, including:

o Expanding the mission of the DHS Office of Citizenship to include civic integration;

o Authorizing $100 million for the office to carry out its new, broader mission;

o Providing grants to States and localities for integration programs; and

o Directing the Education Department to develop a new English learning program to be made available free over the Internet.

FACT: The bill also declares that English is the language of the United States and directs the United States government to preserve and enhance it.

FACT: Individuals seeking to maintain their Z status must meet accelerated English requirements.

Islam, Europe, culture, immigrationDecember 4, 2006 7:28 pm

It was 1683, and Virginians were still settling and assimilating into their new land. However, across the great divide, in the old country, a Polish King turned general saved all of Europe from Islam’s attempt to capture the gateway to Europe, Vienna, Austria. King of Poland Jan III Sobieski defeated the Ottoman Empire at the Battle of Vienna and saved the faith of the continent’s Christians from being forsaken at the point of the sword.

Less than two hundred years later, a Richmond, Virginia newspaper foresaw the future of Paris, France, which prophesy has now come to pass. Readers of the small American newspaper were apprised of the unusual behavior of a ‘Mohammedan’, newly immigrated to Paris and what it portended for Europe’s greatest city.

Muhammadanism to be inaugurated in Paris.
A traveled Turk, Hadji Abd-el-Hamid by name, has become sufficiently cosmopolitan in his taste to be willing to take up his permanent abode among “dogs of infidels.” He has established himself, with his family, in Paris, and, being still a good Mohammedan, he proposes to erect there a mosque, and, in connection with it, an Eastern inn, or caravanserai, baths a la Turk, and a school for instruction in the Koran.
(”Richmond Daily Dispatch“, 13 Feb 1861)

One hundred fifty years later, we, the people of western civilization, are fully aware of the waves of Muslim immigrants who have arrived in our lands, with no intention at all to assimilate into their new cultures. In fact, these immigrants, since the days of Hadj Abd-el-Hamid of 1861, fully expect their own faith and culture to have precedence over any of the native customs and beliefs.

immigrationAugust 10, 2006 10:42 am

The Lost Egyptians
(The image is from Michelle Malkin.)

Somewhere between New York and Montana are these lost souls. Please help Homeland Security help them.
The Lost Egyptians

America, immigrationMay 25, 2006 8:08 am

Colorado Canal

La Hipocresía this is an audio post - click to play

Here are Mexicans crossing a canal after walking over the dry Colorado River bed, as described by “The Washington Post” in “Life Along ‘La Linea’”. Dig the canal deeper, as described in “Fortress America” and there will be no more walking across. Throw in a few alligators and no one will swim either.

Then the screaming will really begin, as Americans who are now advocating for a wall to be built to keep out illegals, will then be asking “where are our illegal drugs and where are our illegal workers?”

America, humor, satire, immigrationMay 24, 2006 10:44 pm

Dungeons, Dragons and Moats - Solutions For Modern Woes
The border between Mexico and the United States spans four U.S. states, six Mexican states, and has over twenty commercial crossings as seen here: MAP from Wikipedia

The Podcast this is an audio post - click to play

Having just posted about our future “Great Gringo Wall” that is being talked about for our border with Mexico, I encountered this great idea whose time is now. Around our Fortress America we will build a moat. After all, that is customary for fortresses and castles, etc. Nature is our friend, as we already have the Atlantic and Pacific moats on two of our sides.

Now we get out the shovels, hire some of those illegals who love to work so much and start digging. We begin at Brownsville on the Gulf of Mexico, head for the Rio Grande to dig it deeper, and take it all the way for 2000 miles to the Pacific Ocean at Tijuana. This will be a much less expensive endeavor than building a “Great Gringo Wall”, as we can transport the soil that we dig out for the two thousand mile moat, down to the Big Easy and there build the kind of strong levees that they need to stay above water. After we drop off the truck loads of dirt in Louisiana, we head on over to Florida and start rounding up those woman-eating alligators that are roaming the streets and cart them back to the Mexican border to be released into the newly dug moat. What a grand scheme! Thenceforth, all the Border Patrol will have to do is watch over the ‘gators and not feed them too much.

When our southern moat is finished, we then fix our attention on the northern border of Fortress America. A moat along our line with Cannuckistan would be an ideal place to dump those pesky Canadian geese that refuse to go back home when winter ends. Then we could give cartes blanches or open season on snow birds, to those hunters and NRA guys with guns in the northern states.

Only trouble, I still haven’t figured out who will dig the Cannuckistan moat, as there are so few illegals along that border who “love” to work.

America, humor, satire, immigration 6:37 pm

The Great Gringo Wall

Gringo DVD
dvdThe United States of America, historically a beacon of freedom for the world, has now discovered that it has no “Great Wall” anywhere in North America. The rush is on, as citizens everywhere are clamoring to build “The Great Gringo Wall” to keep out the Mexicans who are now walking across the open border. What do the Mexicans think about our plans? To say that they’re non-plussed is an understatement as President Vincente Fox has been telling his citizens that the time is coming when they will say “you’re not a real Mexican if you haven’t climbed the Great Gringo Wall.”

Pre-Biblical Walls (only one has survived)

* The Great Wall of China, the longest and largest man-made structure

Classical, Biblical, Byzantine and Feudal Era Walls

* Anastasian Wall in Turkey
* Antonine Wall in Scotland
* Aurelian Walls of Rome
* Walls of Constantinople in Turkey
* Roman limes in Upper Germania, Lower Germania and Rhaetia, Germany
* Hadrian’s Wall in England
* Jericho walls
* Jerusalem’s Old City walls in Jerusalem, Israel
* Kremlin Wall in Moscow, Russia
* Serpent’s Wall, the ancient walls in Ukraine
* Offa’s Dyke between England and Wales
* Servian Wall, in Rome
* Wall of Phaleron, outside Athens, Greece
* Long Walls linking the port of Piraeus to Athens, Greece
* Themistoclean Walls, outside Athens, Greece
* Trajan’s Wall, in Dobruja, Romania
* Western Wall, aka the Wailing Wall, Jerusalem
* Great Wall of Gorgan in Iran

Modern Walls

* Atlantic Wall in France
* Basel City Walls in Basel, Switzerland
* Belfast Peace Lines in Belfast, Northern Ireland
* Berlin Wall in Germany
* Byker Wall in England
* Communards’ Wall in the Père Lachaise cemetery, in Paris, France
* Danevirke, Denmark
* Democracy Wall, in Beijing (1978-1979)
* Flodden wall, in Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
* Lima City Walls in Lima, Peru
* Ian Curtis Wall in Wellington, New Zealand
* Korean wall, Korean Demilitarized Zone
* Lennon Wall in Prague
* London Wall in England
* Moroccan Wall in Western Sahara and Morocco
* York city walls in England

Future Walls

* The Great Gringo Wall in Texas, Arizona, New Mexico and California
* The Great Cannuckistan Ice Wall along the “Fifty-four Forty or Fight!” border.

The list of historical walls was taken from Wikipedia.