<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Kerfuffles Comments</title>
	<link>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com</link>
	<description>Tintinnabulating Out Kerfuffles With Nattering Palaver Since 2002 AD</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 04:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Kerfuffles</title>
		<link>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2008/08/12/john-edwards-timeline/#comment-1386</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:50:51 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2008/08/12/john-edwards-timeline/#comment-1386</guid>
					<description>It must have been about 22nd or 23rd of July that I heard news reports of Edwards being on Obama's short list, while at the same time I was seeing stories from the National Enquirer, which I discounted as Edwards was denying them. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It must have been about 22nd or 23rd of July that I heard news reports of Edwards being on Obama&#8217;s short list, while at the same time I was seeing stories from the National Enquirer, which I discounted as Edwards was denying them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ray</title>
		<link>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2008/08/12/john-edwards-timeline/#comment-1385</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:06:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2008/08/12/john-edwards-timeline/#comment-1385</guid>
					<description>When did Obama last list Edwards on the VP list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>When did Obama last list Edwards on the VP list?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rudy</title>
		<link>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2008/08/10/rich-wretches-john-and-elizabeth-edwards/#comment-1382</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:20:18 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2008/08/10/rich-wretches-john-and-elizabeth-edwards/#comment-1382</guid>
					<description>Edwards cost Hillary the nomination in 2008, just as Perot cost Bush the race with Clinton in 1992.  It's obvious.  Thanks Elizabeth for covering so well for your cheatin' hubby John!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Edwards cost Hillary the nomination in 2008, just as Perot cost Bush the race with Clinton in 1992.  It&#8217;s obvious.  Thanks Elizabeth for covering so well for your cheatin&#8217; hubby John!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Danny Vice</title>
		<link>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2008/08/10/rich-wretches-john-and-elizabeth-edwards/#comment-1381</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:48:15 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2008/08/10/rich-wretches-john-and-elizabeth-edwards/#comment-1381</guid>
					<description>Gitmo which is horrendously old news will likely get more news coverage over the next two years than the Edwards story will, because leftists would rather attack their own country over and over and over and over than make a single one of their own accountable for anything. 

Liberals will be in downplay mode, eager to get back to trashing their own country - saying:

“Poor Edwards’ family.  They must really be hurting right now.  Now let’s get back to talking about how horrible America is...and how Conservatives are to blame – never minding the fact that liberals have been in control of congress for how long?.”

That is the difference….

When a conservative messes up, other conservatives pressure the idiot out of whatever office they hold or hope to hold.  Conservatives don’t start making excuses, yipping again about 6 year old stories designed to announce to the world how much they hate their country.

When a liberal lies, cheats, pays off a mistress and insults others in the process – well then liberals immediately go into all the reasons why it’s no big deal.

Well here’s a news flash for the wild eyed, protest giddy leftist who seems to think this isn’t a big deal…..  this story is not going away in a week.. or two… or three….Why?

Because Edwards is STILL lying about half the story…  He lies even when he “supposedly” is coming clean.  Of course Clinton really said it best – it all depends on what the definition of “is” is……   

Danny Vice
http://www.theweeklyvice.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Gitmo which is horrendously old news will likely get more news coverage over the next two years than the Edwards story will, because leftists would rather attack their own country over and over and over and over than make a single one of their own accountable for anything. </p>
	<p>Liberals will be in downplay mode, eager to get back to trashing their own country - saying:</p>
	<p>“Poor Edwards’ family.  They must really be hurting right now.  Now let’s get back to talking about how horrible America is&#8230;and how Conservatives are to blame – never minding the fact that liberals have been in control of congress for how long?.”</p>
	<p>That is the difference….</p>
	<p>When a conservative messes up, other conservatives pressure the idiot out of whatever office they hold or hope to hold.  Conservatives don’t start making excuses, yipping again about 6 year old stories designed to announce to the world how much they hate their country.</p>
	<p>When a liberal lies, cheats, pays off a mistress and insults others in the process – well then liberals immediately go into all the reasons why it’s no big deal.</p>
	<p>Well here’s a news flash for the wild eyed, protest giddy leftist who seems to think this isn’t a big deal…..  this story is not going away in a week.. or two… or three….Why?</p>
	<p>Because Edwards is STILL lying about half the story…  He lies even when he “supposedly” is coming clean.  Of course Clinton really said it best – it all depends on what the definition of “is” is……   </p>
	<p>Danny Vice<br />
<a href='http://www.theweeklyvice.com' rel='nofollow'>http://www.theweeklyvice.com</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rose</title>
		<link>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2008/08/10/rich-wretches-john-and-elizabeth-edwards/#comment-1380</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 12:36:40 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2008/08/10/rich-wretches-john-and-elizabeth-edwards/#comment-1380</guid>
					<description>Don't blame poor Elizabeth Edwards.  She drank the kool-aid long ago!  You drank it when you started supporting Edwards!!  You also drank the Clinton cocktail by your own admission.  You need to get over your dislike for Republicans.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Don&#8217;t blame poor Elizabeth Edwards.  She drank the kool-aid long ago!  You drank it when you started supporting Edwards!!  You also drank the Clinton cocktail by your own admission.  You need to get over your dislike for Republicans.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ira</title>
		<link>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/feminist-wedding-gift/#comment-1379</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:52:12 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/feminist-wedding-gift/#comment-1379</guid>
					<description>It's funny but creative

Cheers, 
Cheers,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://wedding-cash-gift.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wedding cash gift&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s funny but creative</p>
	<p>Cheers,<br />
Cheers,<br />
<a href="http://wedding-cash-gift.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">wedding cash gift</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ira</title>
		<link>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/feminist-wedding-gift/#comment-1378</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:49:45 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/feminist-wedding-gift/#comment-1378</guid>
					<description>It's like u angry to men. but its funny gift.&quot;all men are bastards&quot;. hehe

Cheers,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://wedding-cash-gift.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wedding cash gift&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s like u angry to men. but its funny gift.&#8221;all men are bastards&#8221;. hehe</p>
	<p>Cheers,<br />
<a href="http://wedding-cash-gift.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">wedding cash gift</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kerfuffles</title>
		<link>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2008/07/13/facebook-unsociable/#comment-1377</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:11:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2008/07/13/facebook-unsociable/#comment-1377</guid>
					<description>On July 16, 2008, PageOnce wrote at their forum: &quot;We are working with Facebook to resolve the Facebook connection issue we are having - once that is resolved we will allow users to add their Facebook accounts if they do not have it added as of yet.&quot; Since then, there has not been any other information as far as I can tell.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>On July 16, 2008, PageOnce wrote at their forum: &#8220;We are working with Facebook to resolve the Facebook connection issue we are having - once that is resolved we will allow users to add their Facebook accounts if they do not have it added as of yet.&#8221; Since then, there has not been any other information as far as I can tell.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt</title>
		<link>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2008/07/13/facebook-unsociable/#comment-1376</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:26:04 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2008/07/13/facebook-unsociable/#comment-1376</guid>
					<description>I found this apparent paradox extremely frustrating as well. What is the technological barrier stopping this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I found this apparent paradox extremely frustrating as well. What is the technological barrier stopping this?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kerfuffles</title>
		<link>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2006/01/25/georgetown-u-ignorami/#comment-1375</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:04:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kerfuffles.blogsome.com/2006/01/25/georgetown-u-ignorami/#comment-1375</guid>
					<description>This quotation &quot;THOSE WHO WOULD SACRIFICE LIBERTY FOR SECURITY, DESERVE NEITHER&quot; is being misrepresented as words of Benjamin Franklin. The quotation is not from him, as far as I can find. It is in fact, a &quot;protest banner&quot; for Progressives, Liberals &amp;amp; Democrats. That is fine for them to have a mantra, but it is not fine for them to claim it as a quote from Ben Franklin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This quotation &#8220;THOSE WHO WOULD SACRIFICE LIBERTY FOR SECURITY, DESERVE NEITHER&#8221; is being misrepresented as words of Benjamin Franklin. The quotation is not from him, as far as I can find. It is in fact, a &#8220;protest banner&#8221; for Progressives, Liberals &amp; Democrats. That is fine for them to have a mantra, but it is not fine for them to claim it as a quote from Ben Franklin.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
